Browsing by Author "Cavdar, Rabia Cigdem"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Conference Object The Impact of Architectural Education on Children(Elsevier Science Bv, 2012) Cavdar, Rabia Cigdem; 237969; 05.02. Mimarlık; 05. Mimarlık Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiArchitectural education as a design education always encourages the creativity. The case studies realized with children shows that facing architecture in early ages when their brain has not formatted has a great potential both for architectural milieu and for consciousness of the children related to their surroundings. Being conscious in early age might bring an opportunity to shape more meaningful environments. For example, there is no need to be an architect to behave responsible with their environment; such as ecological problems, sustainability, traffic problems which are the tools for educating more responsible generations with their environment. They can perceive the world in different ways and constitute a conscious understanding of built environment. These meetings have double sided effect both on their mind and the milieu of architecture. This article will discuss mentioned thoughts above by means of workshops held abroad. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Ayse Cakir IlhanReview Mimarlığın Maddiliği(Middle East Technical Univ, 2020) Çavdar, Rabia Çiğdem; Cavdar, Rabia Cigdem; 237969; Mimarlık; 05.02. Mimarlık; 05. Mimarlık Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiArticle A Neo-Structuralist Perspective on Architectural Theory of Post-Truth Era: Re-Constructing the Architect-Subject(Yildiz Technical Univ, Fac Architecture, 2022) Cavdar, Rabia Cigdem; 237969; 05.02. Mimarlık; 05. Mimarlık Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiThe fundamental aim of the article is to scrutinise the transformations and yet pseudo-disappearance of architectural theory with an archi-theoretical gaze. It is an attempt to reread/ write the architectural theory of the 21st century in the shade of the claim that architectural theory was dead. It is obvious that not only in architecture but also in all social-life structures, free-floating meanings began to invade the totality; every concept that constitutes societal life was dislocated after the digital turn. Concepts began to be depicted with the prefix 'pose; such as post-historical, post-humanist, post-political, post-ideological, post-theory, and even, 'post-truth'. Under these circumstances, the main argument of the article is that architecture could be run as a 'point de capitone' -in Lacanian terminology-, between the subject -described as the sublime object of ideology by Zizek- and the ideology; the role of architecture is to work as a stabiliser on/between the liquid surfaces/grounds. In the context of the main argument, the article is structured on three conceptual domains, which are that ideology, subject and architecture. Architecture as a point de capitone has a significant role in the reconstitution of incommensurable dialectic in the 'redoubling procedure; which works for both recreating the lost otherness, and providing social antagonism.
