Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/25
Browse
Browsing Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü by Publication Category "Kitap Bölümü - Uluslararası"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Book Part Citation - WoS: 27Early Ottoman Diplomacy: Ad Hoc Period(Palgrave, 2003) Ari, Buelent; Arı, Bülent; Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03.05. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03. İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiBook Part Friendship, Leadership and Hegemonic Masculinity: an Interpersonal Relationship Between Turkey and Russia(Palgrave Macmillan, 2022) Ataç, C.A.; 17826; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiSince the Russian intervention in the Syrian crisis and Turkey’s subsequent downing of a Russian jet within the Syrian border in 2015, Russia has become a decisive actor influencing the course of Turkish foreign policy in a way reminding of the troublesome times of the eighteenth-century Ottoman Empire. The increasing influence of Moscow in the decision-making priorities of Ankara has resulted in Turkey’s purchase of S-400, the Russian missile system, which is incompatible with and rival to the NATO infrastructure. President Erdoğan, together with his regional and global counterparts, seeks leadership through friendship in his foreign-policy vision under the AKP rule and emphasizes his interpersonal relations with the world leaders while resolving the conflicts that Turkey involves in. In that respect, the Turkish-Russian relations revolve around the bilateral meetings between Erdoğan and Putin and the S-400 crisis seems to be handling on the friendship level. Against this background, however, one could argue that the recent Turkish-Russian relations unfold along a domination-subordination axis, which is linked to the larger debate on the hegemonic masculinity rather than friendship. This chapter seeks to assess the Turkish-Russian relations with a particular emphasis on the S-400 crisis, from the perspectives of friendship, leadership and hegemonic masculinity. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.Book Part Roman Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Britain Beyond Gibbon: Ancient Norms of Empire for Moderns(Brill, 2013) Ataç, Cemile Akça; Atac, C. Akca; 17826; Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03.05. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03. İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiBook Part Citation - Scopus: 2Russia-Turkey Relations (1991-2016): Diverging Interests and Compelling Realities(Springer International Publishing, 2017) Ekinci, D.; 17316; 03.05. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03. İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiBook Part The Sea That Binds Us: The Eu's Problematic Normative Capacity and The Union for The Mediterranean(I B Tauris & Co Ltd, 2014) Atac, C. Akca; Ataç, Cemile Akça; 17826; Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03.05. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03. İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiBook Part South Caucasus and Covid-19: Vulnerabilities, Setbacks, Responses(Taylor and Francis, 2023) Ekinci, F.D.; 17316; 03.05. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03. İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiThis chapter discusses the impact and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic in the South Caucasus. In the framework of the main argument that multiple regional vulnerabilities and setbacks in healthcare systems and economic capacity inherited from the Soviet era shaped the response capacity of the regional actors with the outbreak of the pandemic, it first provides an account of the pre-pandemic background conditions in these spheres in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, going back to the Soviet period. It then explores the post-1991 and pandemic period conditions in respect of the same actors in the same spheres, maintaining that the pandemic exacerbated the earlier vulnerabilities and led to limited responses. The final analysis affirms the findings and offers some recommendations for the future. © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Erman Akilli, Burak Güneş and Ahmet Gökbel.Book Part Turkish Decision-Making and the Balkans: Implications of Role Theory(Peter Lang AG, 2015) Ekinci, D.; 17316; 03.05. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler; 03. İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi; 01. Çankaya ÜniversitesiThe once-and-for-all change in the end of 1980s brought with it new states in the Balkans, which propelled renewed Turkish policy formulation vis-à-vis the region. The post-Cold War timeline of Turkish-Balkan relations demonstrated foreign-policy attitudes taking shape differently compared to Cold War period due to mutually evolving role identifications and role prescriptions of actors, on which the conceptual baggage of role theory offers a germane framework for enquiry. Changes in role conceptions in Turkey's Balkan relations after 1990 were neither limitless nor thoroughly radical. Relations with the region were undisputedly taken further after the Cold War, and yet remained low-key compared to relations with other neighbouring regions. © Peter Lang GmbH Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften Frankfurt am Main 2015. All rights reserved.
