Çankaya GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The comparison of performance of electrolytic cu and cube tool electrodes in electric discharge machining of ti6al4v alloy

dc.contributor.authorUrtekin, Levent
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorÖzerkan, H. Bekir
dc.contributor.authorÇoğun, Can
dc.contributor.authorUslan, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorID3837tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-27T11:28:08Z
dc.date.available2023-01-27T11:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentÇankaya Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Mekatronik Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractThe most crucial cost element of Electric Discharge Machining (EDM) is the production of tool electrode (shortly electrode). Copper, its alloys, and graphite are the most commonly used electrode materials. Selecting the proper electrode material with low production and material cost, high workpiece material removal rate (MRR) and low tool electrode wear rate (TWR) is key to reducing machining costs with EDM. In this study, the EDM performance of CuBe tool electrodes in the machining of Ti6Al4V alloy was experimentally investigated in comparison to electrolytic Cu (E-Cu) electrodes for different pulse time (ts) and discharge current (I) settings. An increase in MRR and a decrease in TWR and relative wear (RW=TWR/MRR) were observed in machining with CuBe electrodes. However, the high raw material cost of CuBe alloy is an essential drawback in widely using these electrodes in industrial applications. A new performance index formulation is introduced for EDM applications that factor in the production cost of the electrode and its life (i.e., RW). According to our results, the CuBe could be used advantageously as the electrode material at medium current settings. However, at low and high current settings, the low raw material cost of E-Cu makes it more favorable.en_US
dc.identifier.citationUrtekin, Levent...et al (2021)."The comparison of performance of electrolytic cu and cube tool electrodes in electric discharge machining of ti6al4v alloy/ Ti6al4v alaşımının elektro erozyon ile işlemesinde elektrolitik cu ve cube takım elektrotlarının performansının karşılaştırılması", El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1455-1461.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31202/ecjse.946472
dc.identifier.endpage1461en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-3736
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1455en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/6107
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEl-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCuBe Alloyen_US
dc.subjectElectrical Discharge Machiningen_US
dc.subjectElectrolytic Copperen_US
dc.subjectTi6Al4Ven_US
dc.subjectTool Electrodeen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of performance of electrolytic cu and cube tool electrodes in electric discharge machining of ti6al4v alloytr_TR
dc.titleThe Comparison of Performance of Electrolytic Cu and Cube Tool Electrodes in Electric Discharge Machining of Ti6al4v Alloyen_US
dc.title.alternativeTi6al4v Alaşımının Elektro Erozyon ile İşlemesinde Elektrolitik Cu ve Cube Takım Elektrotlarının Performansının Karşılaştırılmasıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Article.pdf
Size:
664.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Yayıncı sürümü

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: