Çankaya GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Track loss versus computation time dilemma in multitarget Ground Target tracking performance

dc.authorscopusid 58824990300
dc.authorscopusid 7003549892
dc.contributor.author Korkmaz, Y.
dc.contributor.author Korkmaz, Yusuf
dc.contributor.author Baykal, B.
dc.contributor.authorID 163694 tr_TR
dc.contributor.other Elektronik ve Haberleşme Mühendisliği
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-09T08:26:24Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-09T08:26:24Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.department Çankaya University en_US
dc.department-temp Korkmaz Y., Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Cankaya University, Ankara, Turkey; Baykal B., Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description Havelsan; Meteksan Savunma; TUBITAK; Metron, Inc.; Office of Naval Research Global (ONRG) en_US
dc.description.abstract Tracking of multiple ground targets with airborne Ground Moving Target Indicator (GMTI) sensor measurements is a challenging problem where heavy and dense false alarms with high target density are inevitably encountered in the surveillance scenes. Hence, optimal approaches require heavy computational load where the duration of overall computation rises exponentially with the number of target tracks and measurements in observation per scan. Consequently, more practical suboptimal approaches, such as Linear Multi-Target (LM) approach, is explored due to linear number of operations in the number of target tracks with a negligible performance loss compared to optimal approaches. Although LM approach performs modestly adequate with significantly less computation duration than optimal approaches, it is highly susceptible to track loss, as in the rest of suboptimal approaches, when the targets are closely spaced and the number of targets and measurements are considerably high. Simulations are carried out in realistic test scenarios to compare single target tracking algorithms including IMM-PDA and IMMIPDA algorithms; Optimal approaches in multitarget tracking including IMM-JPDA, IMM-IJPDA and IMM-JIPDA algorithms and an example of Linear Multi-target approaches in multitarget tracking including IMM-LMIPDA algorithm. Benchmarkings of these algorithms are done under RMSE performance, track loss and computation time evaluation results. © 2013 ISIF ( Intl Society of Information Fusi. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Korkmaz, Yusuf; Baykal, Buyurman (2013). "Track loss versus computation time dilemma in multitarget Ground Target tracking performance", 16th International Conference of Information Fusion, FUSION 2013, 9 July 2013through 12 July 2013, pp. 2168-2176. en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 2176 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 9786058631113
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84890827575
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 2168 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION 2013 -- 16th International Conference of Information Fusion, FUSION 2013 -- 9 July 2013 through 12 July 2013 -- Istanbul -- 101417 en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 2
dc.title Track loss versus computation time dilemma in multitarget Ground Target tracking performance tr_TR
dc.title Track Loss Versus Computation Time Dilemma in Multitarget Ground Target Tracking Performance en_US
dc.type Conference Object en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 091e7147-7627-40d0-bc07-9baff5b81a9a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 091e7147-7627-40d0-bc07-9baff5b81a9a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 3f3f4ac0-1357-4a67-a7c4-465451ea38db
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 3f3f4ac0-1357-4a67-a7c4-465451ea38db

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: