On Comparison Between Iterative Methods for Solving Nonlinear Optimal Control Problems
Loading...

Date
2016
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage Publications Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Recently some semi-analytical methods have been introduced for solving a class of nonlinear optimal control problems such as the Adomian decomposition method, homotopy perturbation method and modified variational iteration method. In this manuscript we compare these methods for solving a type of nonlinear optimal control problem. We prove that these methods are equivalent, which means that they use the same iterative formula to obtain the approximate/analytical solution.
Description
Jafari, Hossein/0000-0001-6807-6675
ORCID
Keywords
Nonlinear Optimal Control Problem, Adomian Decomposition Methods, Homotopy Perturbation Method, Pontryagin'S Maximum Principle, Variational Homotopy Perturbation Method, Numerical methods based on nonlinear programming, nonlinear optimal control problem, Dynamic programming in optimal control and differential games, variational homotopy perturbation method, Nonlinear systems in control theory, Pontryagin's maximum principle, Optimality conditions for free problems in two or more independent variables, Adomian decomposition methods, homotopy perturbation method
Fields of Science
0209 industrial biotechnology, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Jafari, Hossein; Ghasempour, Saber; Baleanu, Dumitru, "On comparison between iterative methods for solving nonlinear optimal control problems", Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 2281-2287, (2016).
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Source
Journal of Vibration and Control
Volume
22
Issue
9
Start Page
2281
End Page
2287
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 13
Scopus : 15
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
SCOPUS™ Citations
15
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
13
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Page Views
6
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Google Scholar™


