Comparison of Ant Colony and Fastest Path Algorithms for Fixed and Variable Number of Nodes in Multi-Hop Networks
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2010
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
In this study, the fastest path algorithm which is known as a routing method from source to destination and Ant colony method which is known to be adaptable to the dynamic changes in the network are compared for average hop counts, power consumption and packet arrival delays by implementing a mobile network simulation. Even the average hop counts for both algorithms reach to almost same value at the simulation results, since it is seen that the fastest path algorithm provides less packet delay and less power consumption with respect to Ant colony algorithm , it is thought that fastest path algorithm may be more useful than Ant colony algorithm for real time voice or video packet transmissions. ©2010 IEEE.
Description
Keywords
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Preveze, Barbaros; Şafak, A. (2010). "Comparison of ant colony and fastest path algorithms for fixed and variable number of nodes in multi-hop networks", SIU 2010 - IEEE 18th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference,18th IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, SIU 201022 April 2010 through 24 April 2010, pp. 535-537.
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
SIU 2010 - IEEE 18th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference -- 18th IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, SIU 2010 -- 22 April 2010 through 24 April 2010 -- Diyarbakir -- 83388
Volume
Issue
Start Page
535
End Page
537
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
Page Views
1
checked on Nov 24, 2025
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.0
Sustainable Development Goals
1
NO POVERTY

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
