Integrating the Resilience Perspective Into the Turkish Planning System: Issues and Challenges
| dc.contributor.author | Kaya, Deniz Altay | |
| dc.contributor.authorID | 54723 | tr_TR |
| dc.contributor.other | 05.03. Şehir ve Bölge Planlama | |
| dc.contributor.other | 05. Mimarlık Fakültesi | |
| dc.contributor.other | 01. Çankaya Üniversitesi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-27T11:18:23Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-18T14:10:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-11-27T11:18:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-18T14:10:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description | Altay-Kaya, Deniz/0000-0002-0709-3452 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Within the last decade, resilience has become both a major planning framework and a development goal for cities and regions facing a plethora of problems in different fields and at different scales. This chapter aims to identify the challenges that await governments when they integrate a resilience thinking framework into their planning systems. The chapter first provides a short explanation on the significance of resilience planning and then outlines a structural model for incorporating the social, economic, political, and institutional requirements in resilience thinking in city and regional planning. Next, the chapter provides a short analysis of the Turkish planning system to reveal its inherent problems and the issues that are likely to be most challenging in a shift towards resilience planning. Finally, based on the provided analyses, the chapter provides a critical discussion on the challenges in operationalizing resilience planning in the Turkish context. The findings reveal that there is a need for restructuring especially in Turkey's institutional and legislative framework to improve coordination and cooperation, to assure the use of scientific knowledge within the decision-making processes, and to actualize the praxes of participation and engaged governance. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Altay Kaya, Deniz. "Integrating the Resilience Perspective into the Turkish Planning System: Issues and Challenges", Urban and Regional Planning in Turkey, Springer, pp. 213-233, 2019. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-05773-2_11 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9783030057732 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9783030057725 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2365-757X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2365-7588 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85060124699 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05773-2_11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/13571 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer international Publishing Ag | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Urban Book Series | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Resilience Thinking | en_US |
| dc.subject | Resilience Planning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Engaged Governance | en_US |
| dc.title | Integrating the Resilience Perspective Into the Turkish Planning System: Issues and Challenges | en_US |
| dc.title | Integrating the Resilience Perspective into the Turkish Planning System: Issues and Challenges | tr_TR |
| dc.type | Book Part | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | Altay-Kaya, Deniz/0000-0002-0709-3452 | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Kaya, Deniz | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 57205462387 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Altay-Kaya, Deniz/V-6721-2018 | |
| gdc.description.department | Çankaya University | en_US |
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | [Kaya, Deniz Altay] Cankaya Univ, Dept City & Reg Planning, Ankara, Turkey | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 233 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Kitap Bölümü - Uluslararası | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q4 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 213 | en_US |
| gdc.description.woscitationindex | Book Citation Index – Social Sciences & Humanities | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2906870324 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000620178100012 | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.83597927 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.84 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 2 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 10 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 2 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 2 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 3 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | c5ef59c6-35ec-4fa6-85be-b0bd9e19e713 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c5ef59c6-35ec-4fa6-85be-b0bd9e19e713 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | be6004ee-9942-49b5-99bd-fd3dec499e43 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 137acb07-994d-4295-95ba-8c16fa3bdef2 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | be6004ee-9942-49b5-99bd-fd3dec499e43 |