Anti-Ship Missile Defense for a Naval Task Group
| dc.contributor.author | Kandiller, Levent | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karasakal, Orhan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozdemirel, Nur Evin | |
| dc.contributor.authorID | 2634 | tr_TR |
| dc.contributor.authorID | 5706 | tr_TR |
| dc.contributor.other | 06.04. Endüstri Mühendisliği | |
| dc.contributor.other | 06. Mühendislik Fakültesi | |
| dc.contributor.other | 01. Çankaya Üniversitesi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-01T08:40:53Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-18T12:06:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-01T08:40:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-18T12:06:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description | Kandiller, Levent/0000-0002-7300-5561; Karasakal, Orhan/0000-0003-0320-487X | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In this study, we present a new formulation for the air defense problem of warships in a naval task group and propose a solution method. We define the missile allocation problem (MAP) as the optimal allocation of a set of surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) of a naval task group to a set of attacking air targets. MAP is a new treatment of an emerging problem fostered by the rapid increase in the capabilities of anti-ship missiles (ASMs), the different levels of air defense capabilities of the warships against the ASM threat, and new technology that enables a fully coordinated and collective defense. In addition to allocating SAMs to ASMs, MAP also schedules launching of SAM rounds according to shoot-look-shoot engagement policy or its variations, considering multiple SAM systems and ASM types. MAP can be used for air defense planning under a given scenario. As thorough scenario analysis would require repetitive use of MAP, we propose efficient heuristic procedures for solving the problem. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 58: 305-322, 2011 | en_US |
| dc.description.publishedMonth | 4 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Karasakal, O., Özdemirel, N.E., Kandiller, L. (2011). Anti-ship missile defense for a naval task group. Naval Research Logistics, 58(3), 305-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nav.20457 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/nav.20457 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0894-069X | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-79953064321 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20457 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10862 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley-blackwell | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Air Defense | en_US |
| dc.subject | Naval Task Group | en_US |
| dc.subject | Missile Allocation Problem | en_US |
| dc.subject | Weapon-Target Allocation | en_US |
| dc.title | Anti-Ship Missile Defense for a Naval Task Group | en_US |
| dc.title | Anti-ship missile defense for a naval task group | tr_TR |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | Kandiller, Levent/0000-0002-7300-5561 | |
| gdc.author.id | Karasakal, Orhan/0000-0003-0320-487X | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Kandiller, Levent | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Karasakal, Orhan | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 6504422870 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 35612115000 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 6506822666 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Karasakal, Orhan/V-6086-2019 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Ozdemirel, Nur/Aaz-8000-2020 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Kandiller, Levent/B-3392-2019 | |
| gdc.description.department | Çankaya University | en_US |
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | [Karasakal, Orhan; Ozdemirel, Nur Evin] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey; [Kandiller, Levent] Cankaya Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06530 Ankara, Turkey | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 322 | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 3 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 305 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 58 | en_US |
| gdc.description.woscitationindex | Science Citation Index Expanded | |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q3 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W1987933637 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000288793600010 | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 4.34057722 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.95 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 23 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 21 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 17 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 36 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 36 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 26 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | ae1b55aa-7f90-4c8c-bbb6-b27b46a3aaa5 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | f5641d3f-4d57-459d-9b86-9e727ec25ad1 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ae1b55aa-7f90-4c8c-bbb6-b27b46a3aaa5 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | b13b59c3-89ea-4b50-b3b2-394f7f057cf8 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 43797d4e-4177-4b74-bd9b-38623b8aeefa | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | b13b59c3-89ea-4b50-b3b2-394f7f057cf8 |