Bilgilendirme: Sürüm Güncellemesi ve versiyon yükseltmesi nedeniyle, geçici süreyle zaman zaman kesintiler yaşanabilir ve veri içeriğinde değişkenlikler gözlemlenebilir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Comparative Assessment and Performance Analysis of Interference Mitigation Techniques for Co-Existent Non-Geostationary and Geostationary Satellites

dc.contributor.author Ozturk, Faik
dc.contributor.author Aydin, Elif
dc.contributor.author Kara, Ali
dc.contributor.other 06.03. Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği
dc.contributor.other 06. Mühendislik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.other 01. Çankaya Üniversitesi
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-11T17:03:25Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-11T17:03:25Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description Kara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619 en_US
dc.description.abstract In recent years, technological developments with user demands, reduced production, and launch costs have rapidly increased the number of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites in space. Since LEO satellites use the same frequency band as existing Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, the interference coordination between the two satellite networks is vital. In order to minimize the co-existent interference between these satellite networks, studies perform on different interference mitigation strategies. In this paper, analysis and comparative assessment of these interference mitigation techniques are presented for the co-existent Non-Geostationary Earth (NGEO) and GEO systems. More specifically, power control (PC) and spatial isolation-based link adaptation (SILA) techniques are studied comparatively for the performance evaluation. It is shown that the communication link bandwidth is more efficiently utilized in the SILA technique when compared with the PC technique. Moreover, the multi-objective optimization problem (MOP) approach in the SILA technique is demonstrated to be more effective when compared with the single-objective optimization problem (SOP) approach used in the PC technique as the simultaneous prioritizing objective functions outperforms single prioritization. Finally, it is shown that when the PC technique is applied together with the SILA technique, the exclusive angle (EA) can be reduced up to 8% for 100 Mbps, and 8.5% for 200 Mbps transmission bit rates in different operational scenarios. The presented performance evaluation in this paper may help the satellite operator or decision-maker gain insights on which mitigation technique can be used in the case of a co-existent interference. This paper proposes analysis and comparative assessment of interference mitigation techniques for the co-existent Non-Geostationary Earth (NGEO) and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) systems. Spatial isolation-based link adaptation (SILA) and power control (PC) techniques are studied comparatively for the performance evaluation. The obtained optimization results show that the communication link bandwidth is more efficiently utilized in the SILA technique when compared with the PC technique because of the simultaneous prioritizing of objective functions. image en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/dac.5956
dc.identifier.issn 1074-5351
dc.identifier.issn 1099-1131
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85203512337
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5956
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/9598
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Co-Existent Interference en_US
dc.subject Exclusion Zone en_US
dc.subject Multi-Objective Optimization en_US
dc.subject Power Control en_US
dc.subject Satellite Communication en_US
dc.subject Spatial Isolation-Based Link Adaptation en_US
dc.title Comparative Assessment and Performance Analysis of Interference Mitigation Techniques for Co-Existent Non-Geostationary and Geostationary Satellites en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Kara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619
gdc.author.institutional Aydın, Elif
gdc.author.scopusid 57297464600
gdc.author.scopusid 56217996200
gdc.author.scopusid 7102824862
gdc.author.wosid Kara, Ali/R-8038-2019
gdc.description.department Çankaya University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Ozturk, Faik] TURKSAT AS, Satellite Operat, Ankara, Turkiye; [Ozturk, Faik] Atilim Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, Ankara, Turkiye; [Aydin, Elif] Cankaya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ankara, Turkiye; [Kara, Ali] Gazi Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ankara, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 18 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 37 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.openalex W4402463087
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001309109300001
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.1
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c430437c-384b-4145-b10b-595a7982d3d6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c430437c-384b-4145-b10b-595a7982d3d6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a8b0a996-7c01-41a1-85be-843ba585ef45
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 43797d4e-4177-4b74-bd9b-38623b8aeefa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery a8b0a996-7c01-41a1-85be-843ba585ef45

Files