Çankaya GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The Entropy Method Integrated Rsm Model To Evaluate Hole Geometries in Electrochemical Blind Hole Drilling

dc.contributor.author Ayhan, E.
dc.contributor.author Yurdakul, M.
dc.contributor.author Çoğun, C.
dc.contributor.author iç, Y.T.
dc.contributor.other Mekatronik Mühendisliği
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-11T16:39:22Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-11T16:39:22Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Çankaya University en_US
dc.department-temp [Ayhan E.] Department of Electronics and Automation, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey; [Yurdakul M.] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey; [Çoğun C.] Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Çankaya University, Ankara, Turkey; [iç Y.T.] Department of Industrial Engineering, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract The electrochemical drilling (ECD) process enables the machining of conductive materials with a wide range of hardness, yield strength, and brittleness. In this study, the ECD experiments have been conducted on blind hole drilling in high-speed steel material using a tailor-made ECD machine. The hole geometries (cross-sectional profiles) at different machining parameters have been examined for the hole depth consistency (HDC), hole cross-sectional area (HCAC) and the hole profile length (HPLC) evaluation (response; output) metrics introduced. The relationships between the hole geometry evaluation metrics and machining parameters are obtained using the response surface method (RSM). Using the Entropy method, an optimisation model is also proposed to combine multiple responses into a single objective function. The effectiveness of the Entropy method is compared with the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). The comparison showed that the Entropy model provides more robust and convenient results than the AHP approach. © 2023 Engineers Australia. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/14484846.2023.2287259
dc.identifier.endpage 325 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1448-4846
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105001829481
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 307 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2023.2287259
dc.identifier.volume 23 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001135918200001
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.institutionauthor Çoğun, Can
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 2
dc.subject Analytical Hierarchy Process en_US
dc.subject Design Of Experiments en_US
dc.subject Electrochemical Drilling en_US
dc.subject Entropy Method en_US
dc.subject Evaluation Metrics en_US
dc.subject Hole Geometry en_US
dc.subject Response Surface Methodology en_US
dc.title The Entropy Method Integrated Rsm Model To Evaluate Hole Geometries in Electrochemical Blind Hole Drilling en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 1
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 6a65abd2-7b4a-480e-874b-7f0d2d1a74ba
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 6a65abd2-7b4a-480e-874b-7f0d2d1a74ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 5b0b2c59-0735-4593-b820-ff3847d58827
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 5b0b2c59-0735-4593-b820-ff3847d58827

Files