Design of Sign Fractional Optimization Paradigms for Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Hammerstein Systems
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer London Ltd
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
Fractional calculus plays a fundamental role in understanding the physics of nonlinear systems due to its heritage of uncertainty, nonlocality and complexity. In this study, novel sign fractional least mean square (F-LMS) algorithms are designed for ease in hardware implementation by applying sign function to input data and estimation error corresponding to first and fractional-order derivative terms in weight update mechanism of the standard F-LMS method. Theoretical expressions are derived for proposed sign F-LMS and its variants; strength of methods for different fractional orders is evaluated numerically through computer simulations for parameter estimation problem based on nonlinear Hammerstein system for low and high signal-noise variations. Comparison of the results from true parameters of the model illustrates the worth of the scheme in terms of accuracy, convergence and robustness. The stability and viability of design methodologies are examined through statistical observations on sufficiently large number of independent runs through mean square deviation and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency performance indices.
Description
Raja, Muhammad Asif Zahoor/0000-0001-9953-822X; Chaudhary, Naveed Ishtiaq/0000-0002-9568-3216; Aslam, Muhammad Saeed/0000-0001-6219-4910
Keywords
Nonlinear System Identification, Sign Regressors, Fractional Adaptive Signal Processing, Hammerstein Models, Control Structures
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Chaudhary, N.I...et al. (2019). "Design of Sign Fractional Optimization Paradigms for Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Hammerstein Systems", Neural Computing and Applications.
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
29
Source
Volume
32
Issue
12
Start Page
8381
End Page
8399
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 33
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 12
SCOPUS™ Citations
33
checked on Nov 26, 2025
Web of Science™ Citations
29
checked on Nov 26, 2025
Page Views
3
checked on Nov 26, 2025
Google Scholar™
