Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Yayın Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/249
Browse
Browsing Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Yayın Koleksiyonu by Scopus Q "Q3"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Review Citation - WoS: 0Enlightenment In the Colony: the Jewish Question and the Crisis of Postcolonial Culture(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2011) Karadeli, Cem; 21252; Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkilerArticle Citation - WoS: 10Is The J-Curve Effect Observable In Turkish Agricultural Sector?(Univ Zagreb, Fac Agriculture, 2006) Yazici, Mehmet; 144084; İktisatThis paper investigates whether or not the J-curve hypothesis holds in Turkish agricultural sector. The analysis is conducted using the model the most commonly employed in j-curve literature. Based on the data covering the period from 1986: I to 1998: III, our results indicate that, following devaluation, agricultural trade balance initially improves, then worsens, and then improves again. This pattern shows that J-curve effect does not exist in Turkish agricultural sector. Another important finding is that devaluation worsens the trade balance of the sector in the long run, a result contradicting with the earlier findings for the Turkish economy as a whole.Review Citation - WoS: 0Islamization of Turkey under the AKP rule(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2013) Turk, H. Bahadir; 18664; Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkilerArticle Citation - WoS: 10Citation - Scopus: 9Pax Ottomanica No More! The "Peace" Discourse in Turkish Foreign Policy in the Post-Davutoglu Era and the Prolonged Syrian Crisis(Wiley, 2019) Atac, C. Akca; 17826Turkey's eight years between 2008 and 2016 has been dominated by Ahmet Davutoglu's vision of foreign policy, which was derived from his multi-edition book Strategic Depth (2000). In order to be able to present itself in its larger periphery as a pro-active, trustworthy actor, Davutoglu argued, Turkey needed to change the foreign-policy paradigms with which it was stranded. As the Strategic Depth vision unfolded, it drew explicit parallels between modern Turkey and the Ottoman neighborhood policy. Turkey-Syria relations since 2008 had been providing the seekers of neo-Ottomanist tendencies in the contemporary Turkish foreign policy with abundant examples, because Syria, once an Ottoman territory and always a challenge to modern Turkey, came to be the first poster country in the shift towards Turkey's imperial awakening. In the post-Davutoglu era, however, the rhetoric and practices of the past eight years seemed suddenly to disappear from the use of the Turkish agents of foreign policy; the new code of terms and actions to replace the Strategic Depth version is yet to be decided. This study seeks to pin down the neo-imperialist character of Turkey's foreign-policy discourse of the aforementioned eight years and contribute to discussions of the Turkish aspiration of neo-Ottomanism with focus on the Syrian crisis through the Justice and Development Party's re-invented peace discourse. In doing so, it aims to find out and elaborate on the current tendencies of Turkish foreign policy, which are no longer as explicit and articulated as they were during Davutoglu's ministry and prime ministry. As Turkey's cross-border operation to Syria - the Euphrates Shield - ends and another one in Idlib begins, a discursive analysis stretching from Davutoglu's diplomatic "zero problems" with Damascus to the military use of ground troops and air force is timely. Such an endeavor would be essential in understanding the spectacular swing from one edge to the other in Turkey's inclination over a phantasmagorical empire.Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 3Renegotiations of femininity throughout the constitutional debates in Turkey: representative claims in 2014 presidential elections(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2018) Yaras, Sezen; Yigit, AhuIn August 2014, for the first time in the history of the Turkish Republic, the president was elected through a popular vote. The quest for a new constitution and revisions to the political system were the main topics that the three presidential candidates, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and Selahattin Demirtas, raised during their presidential campaigns. Women's problems and issues were among the central topics through which the matters of the new constitution and the revisions to be made in the system were addressed. Through a qualitative content analysis of the campaign material, this article maps the candidates' approaches to women's interests and the roles the candidates promised to play to promote these interests and roles. The findings indicate that motherhood, daughterhood and sisterhood are the key terms through which the candidates formulated the ultimate purpose of their gender-related agenda. They simply blamed the existing constitution as the main cause of alienated motherhood, polarized daughterhood and complicit femininity respectively. Based on the analysis of these simultaneous calls for heightening-disavowal of certain femininities, the article argues that competing projects for the (re)establishment of the constitutional regime in Turkey can be construed as renegotiations of feminine attachments to political authority.Review Citation - WoS: 0Representation and Identity From Versailles to The Present(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2011) Karadeli, Cem; 21252; Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkilerBook Part Citation - WoS: 0Roman Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Britain Beyond Gibbon: Ancient Norms of Empire For Moderns(Brill, 2013) Atac, C. Akca; 17826
