Bilgilendirme: Sürüm Güncellemesi ve versiyon yükseltmesi nedeniyle, geçici süreyle zaman zaman kesintiler yaşanabilir ve veri içeriğinde değişkenlikler gözlemlenebilir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

A comparison of iterative Fourier transform algorithms for image quality estimation

dc.contributor.author Alsaka, Dina Yaqoob
dc.contributor.author Arpali, Çağlar
dc.contributor.author Arpali, Serap Altay
dc.contributor.authorID 20809 tr_TR
dc.contributor.other 06.08. Mekatronik Mühendisliği
dc.contributor.other 06.02. Elektronik ve Haberleşme Mühendisliği
dc.contributor.other 06. Mühendislik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.other 01. Çankaya Üniversitesi
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-19T13:15:24Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-19T13:15:24Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.description.abstract A comparison was established between two iterative Fourier transform algorithms (IFTAs), such as the original Gerchberg–Saxton (GS) and the mixed-region amplitude freedom (MRAF) algorithms, for the hologram reconstruction of different target images through the full reference image quality estimation (IQE) and pixel homogeneity in the Fourier plane presented theoretically and experimentally. The comparison was applied depending upon both algorithms based on a computer-generated hologram (CGH) implemented utilizing a reflective phase-modulated liquid-crystal spatial light modulator (LC-SLM) to obtain the digital kinoform holograms of the desired intensity distributions. These digital holograms were applied to reconstruct the intensity patterns for 852 nm, which represents a laser beam source. The theoretical and experimental results of the reconstructed patterns obtained using the MRAF algorithm were found to be smoother and better than the patterns obtained using the GS algorithm. Unmodulated light beam (dc term) is removed from the reconstructed patterns attributed to digital kinoform holograms of MRAF algorithm as an alternative to the theoretical and experimental results without using any additional optic equipment at the light path. Moreover, this paper discussed the full reference objective quality estimations, such as mean square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural content (SC), normalized absolute error (NAE), normalized cross correlation (NK), and homogeneity of pixels, through the contrast (Cont) and inverse difference moment (IDM) for numerical and experimental results. According to the two desired intensity distributions processed theoretically and experimentally, the results of MRAF algorithm were found to be in the highly accurate recovered phase, the quality of image was enhanced, and the dc term was decreased. Image quality estimation of full reference objective relay on the feedback algorithms experimental attestation has not been implemented yet. en_US
dc.description.publishedMonth 10
dc.identifier.citation Alsaka, Dina Yaqoob; Arpali, Çağlar; Arpali, Serap A. (2018). "A comparison of iterative Fourier transform algorithms for image quality estimation", Optical Review, Vol.25, No.5, pp.625-637. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10043-018-0456-x
dc.identifier.issn 13406000
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/7271
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Optical Review en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Computer-Generated Hologram (CGH) en_US
dc.subject Diffractive Optical Element (DOE) en_US
dc.subject Full Reference Objective Quality en_US
dc.subject Iterative Fourier Transform Algorithms en_US
dc.subject Kinoform en_US
dc.subject Optical Hologram Reconstruction en_US
dc.title A comparison of iterative Fourier transform algorithms for image quality estimation tr_TR
dc.title A Comparison of Iterative Fourier Transform Algorithms for Image Quality Estimation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Arpali, Çağlar
gdc.author.institutional Arpali, Serap
gdc.description.department Çankaya Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Mekatronik Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
gdc.description.endpage 637 en_US
gdc.description.issue 5 en_US
gdc.description.startpage 625 en_US
gdc.description.volume 25 en_US
gdc.identifier.openalex W2889492073
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.45181901
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.69
gdc.opencitations.count 14
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 28
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 21
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 99bda09e-d48a-4449-b2d3-dd87f5d01890
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e4a19ff3-435e-4eef-8d1b-35569a68a52a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 99bda09e-d48a-4449-b2d3-dd87f5d01890
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 5b0b2c59-0735-4593-b820-ff3847d58827
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 3f3f4ac0-1357-4a67-a7c4-465451ea38db
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 43797d4e-4177-4b74-bd9b-38623b8aeefa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 5b0b2c59-0735-4593-b820-ff3847d58827

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: