Çankaya GCRIS Premium Database

The scientific memory of Çankaya University. Publications, projects, and researchers—all in one place. The heart of open science beats here. 'Open Science. Visible Impact.'

Scholarly Output
9317
Organisations
38
Current Researchers
262
Projects
56
WoS Logo
WoS Publications
4907
Scopus Logo
Scopus Publications
5278
Tr-Dizin Logo
Tr-Dizin Publications
920
Pubmed Logo
PubMed Publications
367
Thesis Logo
Theses
1745

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

Most Viewed Publications

Uluslararası Hukukta Kuvvet Kullanma Yasağı
Master Thesis
7135
Siyasal Kampanyaların Amerikanlaşması: 2014 Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçiminde Adayların Kampanya Örnekleri
Master Thesis
6236
Türkiye'de lojistik sektörü, sektörde karşılaşılan sorunlar ve lojistik sektörünün ekonomik büyümeye etkisi
Master Thesis
4194
İcra mahkemesi kararlarına karşı istinaf kanun yolu
Master Thesis
3846
Bibliyoterapi
Article
3541

Most Downloaded Publications

Tam İki Tarafa Borç Yükleyen Sözleşmelerde Borçlunun Temerrüdü
Master Thesis
36869
Kindergarten design considerations: a case study on Ankara International Preschool and Kindergarten
Master Thesis
21934
Elektrik dağıtım sektöründe iş sağlığı ve güvenliği mevzuatının ve uygulamalarının incelenmesi ve irdelenmesi
Master Thesis
20743
Olağan ve olağanüstü zamanaşımı yoluyla taşınmazın mülkiyetinin kazanılması
Master Thesis
13887
The impact of foreign direct investment on ghana's economic growth
Master Thesis
13525

Recent Submitted Publications

Thumbnail Image
Conference Object
Analysis of Acoustic Performance in Libraries with Atrium and Case Study
(The Institute of Noise Control Engineering of The USA, Inc., 2025) Kurtay, Cüneyt; Harputlugil, Gülsu Ulukavak; Yaman, Muammer
Thumbnail Image
Master Thesis
Zencefil ekstraktı esaslı nanoparçacıkların biyolojik uygulamalar içın biyosentezi
(2025) Obeıd, Evın Husseın Obeıd; Akın, Şeniz Reyhan Kuşhan; Akbar, Hussain Salih
Green synthesis routes based on medicinal plants are attractive for producing metal‑based nanomaterials. In this study, ginger (Zingiber officinale) extract was used as a phenolic‑rich feedstock for the green synthesis of antibacterial iron‑based nanoparticles, motivated by the need for safer routes and growing concern over antibiotic resistance. Nanoscale products were prepared by infusion and Soxhlet extraction in cold water, hot water and ethanol, with and without iron salts. The materials were characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, DLS and zeta potential, and antibacterial activity was tested against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by disc diffusion. Phase characterization and microscopy showed that iron‑free extracts crystallized mainly as potassium sodium sulfate K₃Na(SO₄)₂ with quasi‑spherical aggregates, whereas Soxhlet extracts containing Fe yielded hydrated iron chlorides (FeCl₃·6H₂O, FeCl₂·4H₂O) rather than the targeted magnetite Fe₃O₄. All dispersions exhibited moderate surface charge (ζ ≈ −22 to +17 mV) and limited colloidal stability. Nevertheless, Soxhlet extraction outperformed classical methods, and the ethanolic Soxhlet system with iron gave the largest inhibition zones compared with ginger extracts or iron alone. This behavior is attributed to higher phenolic loading and better dispersion of Fe‑based hydrates, making Soxhlet ethanol with Fe the most promising route for further optimization.
Thumbnail Image
Master Thesis
Yapay zeka tarafından üretilen eserlerin korunması
(2025) Kubat, Mehmet; Badur, Emel
In the context of intellectual property law, the ability of AI systems to perform human-like creative activities and produce original works raises the question: Who should be recognized as the copyright holder? Pursuant to the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works No. 5846 (FSEK), for a work to be granted protection, it must be embodied in a tangible form, fall within one of the specified categories of works, and most importantly, possess 'originality,' meaning individual distinctiveness. The law recognizes only natural persons as authors; therefore, artificial intelligence (AI) systems cannot be considered authors. The debate on whether AI-generated products can be classified as works is complicated by the fact that these systems lack legal capacity and the human intellectual effort required for originality. Nevertheless, various opinions have been put forward on whether developers or users of AI-generated content may hold rights over such content. However, these approaches have been criticized for potentially leading to the commercialization of ownership and the deepening of social inequalities. This study examines the issue of whether AI-generated content can be recognized as a work under FSEK, assessing it from legal, ethical, and social perspectives, and aims to propose a contemporary solution within the framework of Turkish intellectual property law. The study concludes that, for AI-generated outputs to be protected under intellectual property law, the existing legal framework needs to be updated—perhaps through a specific regulation or by creating a new legal category. However, it is recommended that such regulations not be limited to questions of rights ownership but also address ethical principles, social benefit, cultural production processes, and the protection of creative labor from a broader perspective.
Thumbnail Image
Conference Object
Unveiling the Landscape of Requirements Engineering: Insights from Text Mining
(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2026) Uguz, Sezer; Nazlioglu, Selma; Tokdemir, Gul
Thumbnail Image
Master Thesis
Türkiye'de rüzgar enerjisine ilişkin izinlerin idare hukuku açısından incelenmesi
(2025) Küçük, Ahmet Enes; Ayaydın, Dilhun
Due to the irreversible damage caused by non-renewable energy sources to human health and the world, humanity has turned to cleaner and more reliable energy sources. In this context, wind energy is one of the important renewable energy sources. With energy becoming a necessity today, its provision to citizens has also become a public service. Therefore, the identification, use, and control of energy sources are the responsibility of the administration within the scope of its law enforcement authority. However, the understanding that public services can only be provided by the administration no longer exists today. It is generally accepted that private legal entities can also provide public services, but these services must be under the control and supervision of the administration due to their nature. The administration grants pre-licenses and licenses, which are individual administrative acts, to private legal entities for the performance of public services. A pre-license signifies the responsibility and authority to complete the necessary procedures to obtain a license, while a license signifies the permission required for electricity generation. However, the administration is not entirely free in granting these permissions and is bound by laws. It is also the duty of the administration to grant the aforementioned permits to persons who meet the conditions set forth in the laws. At this point, decisions made by the administration regarding the granting or non-granting of pre-licenses are subject to judicial review, and the cancellation of erroneous decisions may be considered. This study first explains the definition of energy, what energy sources are, the importance of renewable energy sources, and the place of wind energy among these sources, thereby explaining the fundamentals of wind energy from the perspective of administrative law. The second section explains the pre-licensing and licensing processes for wind energy and examines the rights and obligations of the administration and investors in this process. The final section explains the methods of supervision of wind power plants by the administration and the sanctions that may be applied in case of legal violations and explains the judicial authorities to which decisions made in this context may be appealed.