Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Crack Detection on Asphalt Runway Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data With Non-Crack Object Removal and Deep Learning Methods

dc.contributor.author Tapkin, S.
dc.contributor.author Tercan, E.
dc.contributor.author Bostan, A.
dc.contributor.author Şengül, G.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-05T19:53:11Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-05T19:53:11Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Unmanned aerial vehicles are extensively utilized for image acquisition in a cheap, fast, and effective way. In this study, an automatic crack detection method with non-crack object removal and deep learning-based approaches are developed and tested on images captured by unmanned aerial vehicle. The motivation of this study is to detect either a crack exists or not in the asphalt-runway. The novelty of this study lies in integrating a non-crack artifact removal process with six classical edge detectors and comparing the resulting performance with four lightweight CNN models on the same UAV-acquired runway image dataset, enabling a unified evaluation of classical and learning-based approaches. For deep learning-based approach, four lightweight CNN models, namely GoogleNet, SqueezeNet, MobileNetv2, and ShuffleNet, are trained and the best accuracy of 87.9 is obtained whenever GoogleNet model is used. For the non-crack object removal approach, exclusion of non-crack objects from the images is the first step, where crack-detection which makes use of edge-detection techniques is the latter. In the study, Sobel, Prewitt, Canny, Laplacian of Gaussian, Roberts and Zero Cross edge detection algorithms are examined and their success rates in detecting cracks are comparatively presented. With sensitivity=0.981, specificity=0.744, accuracy=0.917, precision=0.912 and F-score=0.945 values Canny algorithm performs significantly better than others in detecting the cracks. This study provides enough evidence for the practicability of automated crack detection on unprocessed digital photographs by the results of the study conducted on asphalt runway. © (c) 2025 Tapkın, S., Tercan, E., Bostan, A. and Şengül, G. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.7764/RDLC.24.3.603
dc.identifier.issn 0717-7925
dc.identifier.issn 0718-915X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105026771482
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.24.3.603
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/15852
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Escuela de Construccion Civil en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de la Construccion en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Asphalt Runway en_US
dc.subject Bersen Thresholding en_US
dc.subject Canny Edge Detector en_US
dc.subject Crack Detection en_US
dc.subject Unmanned Aerial Vehicle en_US
dc.title Crack Detection on Asphalt Runway Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data With Non-Crack Object Removal and Deep Learning Methods en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 23487315300
gdc.author.scopusid 57188748562
gdc.author.scopusid 56040049800
gdc.author.scopusid 8402817900
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Çankaya University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Tapkin] Serkan,; [Tercan] Emre, Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Highways, Ankara, Turkey; [Bostan] Atila, Department of Computer Engineering, Çankaya Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Şengül] Gökhan, Department of Computer Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 631 en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 603 en_US
gdc.description.volume 24 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W7117584026
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.68
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1

Files