Bilgilendirme: Sürüm Güncellemesi ve versiyon yükseltmesi nedeniyle, geçici süreyle zaman zaman kesintiler yaşanabilir ve veri içeriğinde değişkenlikler gözlemlenebilir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Risk Assessment of River-Type Hydropower Plants Using Fuzzy Logic Approach

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2011

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this paper, a fuzzy rating tool was developed for river-type hydropower plant projects, and risk assessment and expert judgments were utilized instead of probabilistic reasoning. The methodology is a multi-criteria decision analysis, which provides a flexible and easily understood way to analyze project risks. The external risks, which are partly under the control of companies, were considered in the model. A total of eleven classes of risk factors were determined based on the expert interviews, field studies and literature review as follows: site geology, land use, environmental issues, grid connection, social acceptance, macroeconomic, natural hazards, change of laws and regulations, terrorism, access to infrastructure and revenue. The relative importance of risk factors was determined from the survey results. The survey was conducted with the experts that have experience in the construction of river-type hydropower schemes. The survey results revealed that the site geology and environmental issues were considered as the most important risks. The new risk assessment method enabled a Risk Index (R) value to be calculated, establishing a 4-grade evaluation system. The proposed risk analysis will give investors a more rational basis to make decisions and it can prevent cost and schedule overruns. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Hydropower, Risk Analysis, Fuzzy Logic

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

Küçükali, S. (2011). Risk assessment of river-type hydropower plants using fuzzy logic approach. Energy Policy, 93(10), 6683-6688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.067

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
45

Source

Volume

39

Issue

10

Start Page

6683

End Page

6688
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 17

Scopus : 51

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 124

SCOPUS™ Citations

51

checked on Nov 24, 2025

Web of Science™ Citations

44

checked on Nov 24, 2025

Page Views

1

checked on Nov 24, 2025

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
5.57685836

Sustainable Development Goals

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

6

CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo