Risk Assessment of River-Type Hydropower Plants Using Fuzzy Logic Approach
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2011
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
In this paper, a fuzzy rating tool was developed for river-type hydropower plant projects, and risk assessment and expert judgments were utilized instead of probabilistic reasoning. The methodology is a multi-criteria decision analysis, which provides a flexible and easily understood way to analyze project risks. The external risks, which are partly under the control of companies, were considered in the model. A total of eleven classes of risk factors were determined based on the expert interviews, field studies and literature review as follows: site geology, land use, environmental issues, grid connection, social acceptance, macroeconomic, natural hazards, change of laws and regulations, terrorism, access to infrastructure and revenue. The relative importance of risk factors was determined from the survey results. The survey was conducted with the experts that have experience in the construction of river-type hydropower schemes. The survey results revealed that the site geology and environmental issues were considered as the most important risks. The new risk assessment method enabled a Risk Index (R) value to be calculated, establishing a 4-grade evaluation system. The proposed risk analysis will give investors a more rational basis to make decisions and it can prevent cost and schedule overruns. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Hydropower, Risk Analysis, Fuzzy Logic
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Küçükali, S. (2011). Risk assessment of river-type hydropower plants using fuzzy logic approach. Energy Policy, 93(10), 6683-6688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.067
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
45
Source
Volume
39
Issue
10
Start Page
6683
End Page
6688
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 17
Scopus : 51
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 124
SCOPUS™ Citations
51
checked on Nov 24, 2025
Web of Science™ Citations
44
checked on Nov 24, 2025
Page Views
1
checked on Nov 24, 2025
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
5.57685836
Sustainable Development Goals
2
ZERO HUNGER

3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

5
GENDER EQUALITY

6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

13
CLIMATE ACTION

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
