Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Developing and Validating a Rubric-Based Approach to Quality Assurance in Turkish Higher Education

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This study, initiated by the Turkish Higher Education Quality Council (THEQC), develops and validates a rubricbased approach for evaluating institutional quality assurance (QA) processes within the Turkish higher education ecosystem. Effective quality assurance (QA) in higher education requires evaluation tools that are methodologically robust, responsive to institutional needs, and aligned with international benchmarks. A rubric-based approach offers a structured and transparent framework for consistent assessments. The rubric was created through an iterative, evidence-based process incorporating expert feedback, international benchmarks, site visits, and prior research. It consists of 22 main criteria across four key domains-Leadership, Governance and Quality; Learning and Teaching; Research and Development; and Service to Society-subdivided into 46 sub-criteria, each assessed on a five-point maturity scale. The validity and reliability of the rubric were rigorously examined. Content validity was established through evaluations by 10 QA professionals, addressing four key dimensions: relevance, alignment with the intended domain, appropriateness for the target audience, and clarity of language. Construct and criterion validity were assessed through consistency checks and usability analyses, with data collected from 252 external evaluators across 57 higher education institutions. Additionally, 360-degree feedback was gathered from both external evaluation teams and the institutions involved in the evaluation process. Results: demonstrate strong content validity (Lawshe coefficient =1.00, p < .05), high interrater consistency, and strong usability across various evaluator groups. Further evaluation confirmed the rubric's applicability and robustness across diverse institutional contexts. This study concludes that the developed rubric is a reliable and valid tool for enhancing and evaluating quality assurance practices in higher education.

Description

Bardakci, Salih/0000-0003-1163-2794

Keywords

Quality Assurance, Higher Education, Rubric-Based Evaluation, Development, Validity, Reliability

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volume

113

Issue

Start Page

102673

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 0

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 14

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals