Per Unit Received Power Apertured Averaged Scintillation of Partially Coherent Sinusoidal and Hyperbolic Gaussian Beams
Loading...

Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
We evaluate the per unit power received power aperture averaged scintillation performance of fully and partially coherent sinusoidal and hyperbolic Gaussian beams. Our analysis includes fundamental Gaussian, cosh Gaussian, cos Gaussian and annular Gaussian beams. The method is based on our earlier introduced semi-analytic approach. Scintillation performance is measured upon dividing the aperture averaged scintillation by the received power. Assessment is made both for aperture sizes that are adjusted separately for full and partially coherent beams to capture 10% and 20% of the equal source power and also for fixed aperture sizes. This way, the scintillation performance of the different beams in question is compared. From this comparison, we find that partially coherent beams have lower scintillation than the fully coherent ones, when adjustable aperture size is used. But upon switching to fixed aperture size, the reverse happens and coherent beams become more advantageous. In all cases of comparison, small source sized annular Gaussian beam and large source sized Gaussian beam seem to offer the lowest scintillation when aperture size is adjusted to capture 20% of the equal source power. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Scintillation, Aperture Averaging, Sinusoidal Hyperbolic Gaussian Beams
Fields of Science
0103 physical sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Eyyuboğlu, H.T. (2015). Per unit received power apertured averaged scintillation of partially coherent sinusoidal and hyperbolic Gaussian beams. Optic And Laser Technology, 71, 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.03.001
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
14
Source
Optics & Laser Technology
Volume
71
Issue
Start Page
55
End Page
62
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


