Çankaya GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Revisiting the Concept of Ephemerality in the Counter-Culture Architecture of the 1960s: Infatable Structures

dc.contributor.authorEryılmaz, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorID283453tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-14T08:04:58Z
dc.date.available2024-05-14T08:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentÇankaya Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, İç Mimarlık Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIn his 1969 project An Experimental Bottery, published in the ninth issue of Archigram, David Greene introduces time as a concept that has had a significant impact on the arts over the past few years, but not so much on architecture. Still, he proposed the temporary space as the example of “an architecture that exists only with reference to time” by pointing out its potential to last in memory. Along this line of thought, this paper aims to make inquiry into the critical examples of temporary architecture to reflect on how they challenge architecture’s long-standing claim to permanence and thus attempt to transform the conventional relationship between architecture and time. To do so, it discusses a selection of inflatable structures that had been produced by such avant-garde architecture collectives as Archigram, Haus-Rucker-Co, and Coop Himmelb(l)au between the late 1960s and early 1970s. Starting from the assumption that these experimental spaces contribute to the expansion of the established boundaries of the discipline as they are situated at the margins of dominating architectural culture, this research provides a ground to argue how inflatable structures turned into a critical medium to reassess architecture’s relation with time during this period which was marked by technological developments and social, political and cultural upheavals.In his 1969 project An Experimental Bottery, published in the ninth issue of Archigram, David Greene introduces time as a concept that has had a significant impact on the arts over the past few years, but not so much on architecture. Still, he proposed the temporary space as the example of “an architecture that exists only with reference to time” by pointing out its potential to last in memory. Along this line of thought, this paper aims to make inquiry into the critical examples of temporary architecture to reflect on how they challenge architecture’s long-standing claim to permanence and thus attempt to transform the conventional relationship between architecture and time. To do so, it discusses a selection of inflatable structures that had been produced by such avant-garde architecture collectives as Archigram, Haus-Rucker-Co, and Coop Himmelb(l)au between the late 1960s and early 1970s. Starting from the assumption that these experimental spaces contribute to the expansion of the established boundaries of the discipline as they are situated at the margins of dominating architectural culture, this research provides a ground to argue how inflatable structures turned into a critical medium to reassess architecture’s relation with time during this period which was marked by technological developments and social, political and cultural upheavals.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEryılmaz, Burcu. (2022). "Revisiting the Concept of Ephemerality in the Counter-Culture Architecture of the 1960s: Infatable Structures", sITA – studii de Istoria şi Teoria Arhitecturii, No.10, pp.41-54.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage54en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage41en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8301
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofsITA – studii de Istoria şi Teoria Arhitecturiien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInfatable Structuresen_US
dc.subjectEphemeralityen_US
dc.subjectTemporalityen_US
dc.subjectPermanenceen_US
dc.subjectPneumaticsen_US
dc.titleRevisiting the Concept of Ephemerality in the Counter-Culture Architecture of the 1960s: Infatable Structurestr_TR
dc.titleRevisiting the Concept of Ephemerality in the Counter-Culture Architecture of the 1960s: Infatable Structuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: