Competitiveness of Major Exporting Countries and Turkey in the World Fishery Market: a Constant Market Share Analysis
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2005
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine whether and to what extent the shares of selected countries' fishery exports in the world markets reflect their international competitiveness. The Constant Market Share (CMS) model, which decomposes export growth into some broad components (i.e., structural effects, market effects, commodity effects and competitive effects), is applied to examine this issue. The results of decomposition analysis revealed that structural factors have been more significant in explaining the growth of exports. The growth effects, though, appeared positive for each country, the exports of open economies like Canada, the United States, Iceland and Turkey benefited more from the growth of world exports. The analysis of commodity composition and market effects suggests that countries like Canada, the United States, Iceland and Turkey were pursuing the product differentiation policy and were penetrating in those markets, which have been growing relatively faster. These countries remained committed throughout the sample period (i.e., 1980-2000) to export their diversified products in fast-growing markets. The analysis of competitiveness effects, which are derived as a residual, show that Norway, Spain, the United States, Indonesia, Thailand, sChile and China were strong fishery exporters and increased their competitiveness during the sample period. Copyright © 2005 IAAEM.
Description
Keywords
Constant Market Share, Export Performance, Fishery, International Competitiveness, International Trade
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
Klasra, M.A.; Fidan, H.,"Competitiveness of Major Exporting Countries and Turkey in the World Fishery Market: A Constant Market Share Analysis",Aquaculture Economics and Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 317-330, (2005).
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
Aquaculture Economics and Management
Volume
9
Issue
3
Start Page
317
End Page
330
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 10
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 25
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.0
Sustainable Development Goals
1
NO POVERTY

3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

13
CLIMATE ACTION

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
