Çankaya GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Two Majority Voting Classifiers Applied to Heart Disease Prediction

dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, Talha
dc.contributor.authorMaraş, Hadi Hakan
dc.contributor.authorTokdemir, Gül
dc.contributor.authorErgezer, Halit
dc.contributor.authorID34410tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID293396tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T12:34:01Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T12:34:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentÇankaya Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractTwo novel methods for heart disease prediction, which use the kurtosis of the features and the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, are presented. A Majority Voting approach is applied, and two base classifiers are derived through statistical weight calculation. First, exploitation of attribute kurtosis and attribute Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (KS test) result is done by plugging the base categorizer into a Bagging Classifier. Second, fitting Maxwell random variables to the components and summating KS statistics are used for weight assignment. We have compared state-of-the-art methods to the proposed classifiers and reported the results. According to the findings, our Gaussian distribution and kurtosis-based Majority Voting Bagging Classifier (GKMVB) and Maxwell Distribution-based Majority Voting Bagging Classifier (MKMVB) outperform SVM, ANN, and Naive Bayes algorithms. In this context, which also indicates, especially when we consider that the KS test and kurtosis hack is intuitive, that the proposed routine is promising. Following the state-of-the-art, the experiments were conducted on two well-known datasets of Heart Disease Prediction, namely Statlog, and Spectf. A comparison of Optimized Precision is made to prove the effectiveness of the methods: the newly proposed methods attained 85.6 and 81.0 for Statlog and Spectf, respectively (while the state of the heart attained 83.5 and 71.6, respectively). We claim that the Majority Voting family of classifiers is still open to new developments through appropriate weight assignment. This claim is obvious, especially when its simple structure is fused with the Ensemble Methods’ generalization ability and success.en_US
dc.description.publishedMonth3
dc.identifier.citationKaradeniz, Talha;...et.al. (2023). "Two Majority Voting Classifiers Applied to Heart Disease Prediction", Applied Sciences, Vol.13, No.6.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app13063767
dc.identifier.issn20763417
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/6986
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBagging Classifieren_US
dc.subjectEnsemble Methodsen_US
dc.subjectGaussian Distributionen_US
dc.subjectHeart Disease Predictionen_US
dc.subjectKurtosisen_US
dc.subjectMajority Voting Classifieren_US
dc.titleTwo Majority Voting Classifiers Applied to Heart Disease Predictiontr_TR
dc.titleTwo Majority Voting Classifiers Applied To Heart Disease Predictionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Article.pdf
Size:
392.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Yayıncı sürümü

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: