Bilgilendirme: Sürüm Güncellemesi ve versiyon yükseltmesi nedeniyle, geçici süreyle zaman zaman kesintiler yaşanabilir ve veri içeriğinde değişkenlikler gözlemlenebilir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Bioglass-Polymer Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: a Review of Current Trends

dc.contributor.author Motameni, Ali
dc.contributor.author Cardakli, Ismail Seckin
dc.contributor.author Gurbuz, Riza
dc.contributor.author Alshemary, Ammar Z. Z.
dc.contributor.author Razavi, Mehdi
dc.contributor.author Farukoglu, Omer Can
dc.contributor.other 01. Çankaya Üniversitesi
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-28T12:58:52Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-18T16:08:19Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-28T12:58:52Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-18T16:08:19Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description Razavi, Mehdi/0000-0002-3020-6187 en_US
dc.description.abstract Biocompatible and bioactive composite scaffolds are essential in bone tissue regeneration because of their bioactivity and multilevel porous assemblies. There is a high demand for three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to treat bone regeneration defects, trauma, and congenital skeletal abnormalities in the current scenario. The main objective of this review is to collect all the possible information concerning synthetic and natural polymer-Bioglass (BG)-based scaffold materials and systematically present them to summarize the importance and need for these materials. The importance of the bone tissue engineering field has been highlighted. Given the current challenges, a comprehensive description of materials fabrication and patterns in scaffold structures is required. This review also includes the most crucial aspect of this study: why are polymeric materials mixed with BG materials? Individually, both BG and polymeric materials lack specific essential characteristics to enhance the scope of these materials. However, preparing the composites of both ensures the researchers that composites of polymers and BG have improved properties that make them versatile materials for bone tissue engineering applications. This study deals with the individual drawbacks of the inorganic BGs, synthetic polymers, and the deficiencies of natural polymers. This study has also included a brief description of various scaffold fabricating techniques. Finally, this study revealed that by manufacturing and developing novel composite materials-scaffolds bearing the capability to repair, heal, and regenerate accidentally damaged or badly injured bones, many occasional problems can be solved in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, this review demonstrated that natural polymeric materials present many advantages over synthetic bone grafts. Yet, synthetic biomaterials have one additional attractive feature, as they have the flexibility to be designed according to the desired demands. These features make them the best choice for a wide range of bone tissue engineering projects for orthopedic surgeons. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Motameni, Ali...et.al. (2023). "Bioglass-polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: a review of current trends", International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/00914037.2023.2186864
dc.identifier.issn 0091-4037
dc.identifier.issn 1563-535X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85150589978
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2023.2186864
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/15024
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Bone Tissue en_US
dc.subject Scaffolds en_US
dc.subject Bioglass en_US
dc.subject Synthetic Polymers en_US
dc.subject Natural Polymers en_US
dc.title Bioglass-Polymer Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: a Review of Current Trends en_US
dc.title Bioglass-polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: a review of current trends tr_TR
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Razavi, Mehdi/0000-0002-3020-6187
gdc.author.scopusid 57211405451
gdc.author.scopusid 37057050400
gdc.author.scopusid 57190855151
gdc.author.scopusid 55503590800
gdc.author.scopusid 8229916200
gdc.author.scopusid 57222479763
gdc.author.wosid Razavi, Mehdi/I-1151-2015
gdc.author.wosid Çardaklı, İsmail/Aab-1340-2021
gdc.author.wosid Alshemary, Ammar Z/Gro-3664-2022
gdc.description.department Çankaya University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Motameni, Ali; Gurbuz, Riza] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Ankara, Turkiye; [Motameni, Ali; Farukoglu, Omer Can] Cankaya Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkiye; [Cardakli, Ismail Seckin] Ataturk Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Erzurum, Turkiye; [Alshemary, Ammar Z. Z.] Wenzhou Kean Univ, Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Chem, Wenzhou, Peoples R China; [Alshemary, Ammar Z. Z.] Al Mustaqbal Univ Coll, Biomed Engn Dept, Hillah, Iraq; [Razavi, Mehdi] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Biionix Bion Mat Implants & Interfaces Cluster, Orlando, FL USA; [Razavi, Mehdi] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Orlando, FL USA; [Farukoglu, Omer Can] Gazi Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 619 en_US
gdc.description.issue 7 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 600 en_US
gdc.description.volume 73 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.identifier.openalex W4324144810
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000949701600001
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.01868294
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.89
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 8
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 2
gdc.plumx.mendeley 32
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 19
gdc.scopus.citedcount 17
gdc.wos.citedcount 16
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1

Files