Bilgilendirme: Sürüm Güncellemesi ve versiyon yükseltmesi nedeniyle, geçici süreyle zaman zaman kesintiler yaşanabilir ve veri içeriğinde değişkenlikler gözlemlenebilir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Is there a Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Puzzle? New Evidence from a Nonlinear Asymmetric Panel Unit Root Test

Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This study re-examines the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis for 24 OECD countries. The econometric methodology implemented not only allows for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion within a panel context, but also corrects for the cross-sectional dependence bias frequently encountered in panel data. This feature is important because a test that ignores the presence of asymmetry and cross-sectional dependence when they are in fact present in the data would lead to misleading results. We obtain relatively stronger evidence in favor of the PPP hypothesis when compared to the other alternative panel unit root tests. However, on the whole, this support is still weak even after allowing for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion in the real exchange rate series. Therefore, to reconcile the data with the theory further methods should be developed.

Description

Keywords

PPP Hypothesis, Asymmetric Nonlinear Mean Reversion, Panel Unit Root Test

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

Çorakçı, Ayşegül. (2016). "Is there a Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Puzzle? New Evidence from a Nonlinear Asymmetric Panel Unit Root Test", Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Vol.27, No.99, pp.237-266.

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Ekonomik Yaklasim

Volume

27

Issue

99

Start Page

237

End Page

266
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 3

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals

2

ZERO HUNGER
ZERO HUNGER Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo