Çankaya GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Does Perceived Social Support Buffer the Negative Effects of Type C Personality on Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients?

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2014

Authors

Tathan, Ece
Yılmaz, Tuğba

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Events

Abstract

The present study investigated possible Type C personality-quality of life (QOL) relationship, and the moderating role of perceived social support in this relation among 101 postoperative breast cancer patients. Participants were from different cities in Turkey but receiving treatment in the capital, Ankara. Obtained data were analyzed by moderated regression analysis. According to the results, Type C personality was not related to the QOL of participants, however, higher perceived social support was associated with better QOL in patients. Also, perceived social support moderated Type C personality-QOL relation. Accordingly, patients high on Type C personality and perceived social support had the highest QOL. In contrast, patients high on Type C personality and low on perceived social support had the lowest QOL. Findings, as well as the strengths and limitations of the study, were discussed in the light of the relevant literature. As a possible clinical implication, enhancement of social support networks of the patients were suggested.

Description

Keywords

Type C Personality, Breast Cancer, Quality of Life, Social Support

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

Bozo, Özlem; Tathan, Ece; Yılmaz, Tuğba (2014). "Does Perceived Social Support Buffer the Negative Effects of Type C Personality on Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients?", Social Indicators Research, Vol. 119, No. 2, pp. 791-801.

WoS Q

Scopus Q

Source

Social Indicators Research

Volume

119

Issue

2

Start Page

791

End Page

801