İç Mimarlık Bölümü Yayın Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/398
Browse
Browsing İç Mimarlık Bölümü Yayın Koleksiyonu by Author "17487"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 2A historical project: Doubling INDL exhibition catalogue(Middle East Technical Univ, 2013) Mutlu Tunca, Gulru; 17487; İç MimarlıkArticle DESIGN AND COUNTER DESIGN AGAINST CONSUMPTION: 1972 “ITALY, THE NEW DOMESTIC LANDSCAPE” EXHIBITION (1)(2023) Boysan, Aysu; Tunca, Gülru Mutlu; 17487; İç MimarlıkIn Western Europe, the 1960s and 1970s covered the radical criticism of some European designers against mass production and consumption. Several Italian Radical designers raised the most compelling objection at an exhibition on the other side of the ocean: “Italy: The New Domestic Landscape” (INDL), curated by Emilio Ambasz in the Museum of Modern Art, New York, in 1972. INDL marked a significant moment in contemporary design history. For the show, Ambasz selected more than a hundred “objects” produced by Italian manufacturers and displayed them in specially designed cases in the garden area. Moreover, he invited eleven Italian designers to create unique “microenvironments” by interpreting concepts assigned by a “special design program,” such as environmental psychology, locality, urbanism, micro and macro-scale housing, consumerism, and mass production. Although the “objects” displayed in the garden were of great importance - since the event was one of the first instances of Italian design’s introduction to the American public-this study concentrates on the contradicting responses of Italian designers, under headings “design and counterdesign as postulation” for understanding the design philosophy behind the appearance of “design versus non-design” dialectics of that era, which is still a recognized topic in contemporary architectural theory. This study, therefore, analyzes the eclectic and postmodern approaches of six Italian designers in the “design” category and the provocative denials of Radical designers presented under the “counterdesign” category. It aims to understand better the impact of this discursive opposition made visible by the exhibition on the anticonsumerist approaches and the search for alternative methodologies, which subsequently increased among designers.Article Citation - WoS: 0Citation - Scopus: 0Design And Counter Design Against Consumption: 1972 "Italy, The New Domestic Landscape" Exhibition (1)(Middle East Technical Univ, 2023) Boysan, Aysu; Tunca, Guelru Mutlu; 17487; İç MimarlıkIn Western Europe, the 1960s and 1970s covered the radical criticism of some European designers against mass production and consumption. Several Italian Radical designers raised the most compelling objection at an exhibition on the other side of the ocean: "Italy: The New Domestic Landscape" (INDL), curated by Emilio Ambasz in the Museum of Modern Art, New York, in 1972. INDL marked a significant moment in contemporary design history. For the show, Ambasz selected more than a hundred "objects" produced by Italian manufacturers and displayed them in specially designed cases in the garden area. Moreover, he invited eleven Italian designers to create unique "microenvironments" by interpreting concepts assigned by a "special design program," such as environmental psychology, locality, urbanism, micro and macro-scale housing, consumerism, and mass production. Although the "objects" displayed in the garden were of great importance -since the event was one of the first instances of Italian design's introduction to the American public-this study concentrates on the contradicting responses of Italian designers, under headings "design and counterdesign as postulation" for understanding the design philosophy behind the appearance of "design versus non-design" dialectics of that era, which is still a recognized topic in contemporary architectural theory. This study, therefore, analyzes the eclectic and postmodern approaches of six Italian designers in the "design" category and the provocative denials of Radical designers presented under the "counterdesign" category. It aims to understand better the impact of this discursive opposition made visible by the exhibition on the anti -consumerist approaches and the search for alternative methodologies, which subsequently increased among designers.Article Designing parametric rhizomes in architectural space(2021) Demirbaş, Güler Ufuk; Tunca, Gülru Mutlu; 17487; 17572; İç MimarlıkThe technological developments in the world present a challenge to designstudio students and educators alike since the incorporation of computeraided design software into design education has become a necessity. Thispaper focuses on the 2019-2020 Spring Semester of INAR 302 InteriorDesign Studio IV at Çankaya University, which is a parametric designstudio where students are encouraged to experiment and utilize computerbased form-finding strategies, concentrating on the interior space. Therhizome concept of Deleuze and Guattari is reinterpreted by Studio 302as a design methodology, allowing students to experience the unorthodoxyof space-user dialectics in the inner voids of the parametric forms over theterm project of re-functioning a part of Ulus Square Office Complex as acity hotel with a futuristic extension. The study examines and evaluates thestudents' works, which derive conceptual ideas from the formal analysesof ceramic artworks in the Anafartalar Bazaar and environmental analysesof the historic site, transforming them into the parameters of futuristicarchitectural form and diverse rhizome interpretations. The findingsindicate that students' reinterpretations of \"variations\" in the ceramicartworks uncover multifaceted outcomes of digital design strategies,maintaining diverse rhizomatic progress, which synchronically determinesand is determined by the functional mutations