Psikoloji Bölümü

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/416

Browse

Browsing Psikoloji Bölümü by Subject "Abusive Supervision"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Citation Count: Sümer, H. Canan...et al. (2024). "Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study", Journal of Psychology.
    Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study
    (2024) Sümer, H. Canan; Göncü Köse, Aslı; Toker Gültaş, Yonca; Acar, F. Pınar; Karanfil, Derya; Ok, A. Başak; 166202; Çankaya Üniversitesi, Fen - Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
    Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Türkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (N = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (N = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (N range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (N = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (N = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales’ ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts.
  • Item
    Citation Count: Onaran, S.O.;İ Göcü Köse, A. (2023). "Mediating processes in the relationships of abusive supervision with instigated incivility, CWBs, OCBs, and multidimensional work motivation", Current Psychology, Vol.42, No.23, pp.19881-19893.
    Mediating processes in the relationships of abusive supervision with instigated incivility, CWBs, OCBs, and multidimensional work motivation
    (2023-08) Onaran, Sami Okan; Göncü Köse, Aslı; 166202; Çankaya Üniversitesi, Fen - Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
    We examined how abusive supervision (AS) affected instigated workplace incivility, counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs), organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), and multidimensional work motivations (MWMs), in line with the Job Demands-Resources Model and Social Exchange Theory. We suggested that employees' identification with their workgroup moderates the link between AS and instigated incivility toward coworkers and that organizational identification partially mediates the association of AS with CWBs and OCBs. Furthermore, we hypothesized positive correlations between AS and external regulation as well as amotivation, consistent with the Self-Determination Theory. Finally, we predicted that job-related affective well-being would fully mediate the link between AS and autonomous work motivations while only partially mediating the link between AS and amotivation. Online surveys were used to collect data from 519 white-collar workers. The data revealed that AS was linked to a higher level of incivility toward coworkers. Furthermore, it was linked to both CWBs and OCBs, both directly and indirectly through organizational identification. Organizational identification mediated the associations between AS and MWMs as well. Finally, job-related affective well-being mediated the links of AS with external regulation, amotivation, and autonomous work motivations. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.