Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Gültekin, Tanju

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/9321
Name Variants
Gültekin, A. Tanju
Job Title
Prof. Dr.
Email Address
gultekin@cankaya.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
Mimarlık
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

2

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

181/9

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment1
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

2011 - 20142
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Conceptual framework for potential implementations of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for design quality assessment
    (2011) Harputlugil, Timuçin; Prins, Matthijs; Gültekin, A. Tanju; Topçu, İlker
    Architectural design can be considered as a process influenced by many stakeholders, each of which has different decision power. Each stakeholder might have his/her own criteria and weightings depending on his/her own perspective and role. Hence design can be seen as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process. Considering architectural design, its evaluation and quality assessment within a context of MCDM is not regularly performed within building processes. The aim of the paper is to find/adapt proper methodologies of MCDM, used in other domains for assessment of design quality, adapt them to the construction domain and test their applicability. Current tools (for instance DQI, DEEP, AEDET, HQI, LEED, BREEAM, BQA) for quality assessment will be reviewed and compared with several MCDM methods (ie. AHP, ANP, PROMETHEE, SAW AND TOPSIS). Advantages and disadvantages of gathered outcomes from comparisons for assessment and applicability within architectural design will be discussed. Finally reflections on the outcomes will be provided.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Architectural Design Quality Assessment Based On Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study(1)
    (2014) Prıns, Matthijs; Topçu, Y. İlker; Gültekin, A. Tanju; Harputlugil, Timuçin