Understanding Personality Differences in Software Organisations Using Keirsey Temperament Sorter
Loading...

Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
inst Engineering Technology-iet
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
Yes
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in exploring personality differences to improve work experience in software organisations. This study presents a personality assessment process conducted on 382 software practitioners using the Keirsey temperament sorter II. The primary goal of this assessment is to explore the personality temperaments of software practitioners working in different types of software development organisations. In addition, a novel visualisation approach is proposed for arranging temperaments using a periodic table-like structure. The results suggest that the authors approach provides an effective means to investigate an organisation's personality profile while assessing personality types.
Description
Yilmaz, Murat/0000-0002-2446-3224; O'Connor, Rory/0000-0001-9253-0313
Keywords
Software Development Management, Human Factors, Software Houses, Personality Differences, Personality Assessment Process, Keirsey Temperament Sorter Ii, Personality Temperaments, Software Development Organisations, Visualisation Approach, Periodic Table-Like Structure, Organisation Personality Profile, personality assessments, Software engineering, Keirsey Temperament Sorter, periodic table-like visualizations, 150, personality traits of software practitioners, personality profling
Fields of Science
0504 sociology, 05 social sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Understanding personality differences in software organisations using Keirsey temperament sorter
By:Yilmaz, M (Yilmaz, Murat)[ 1 ] ; O'Connor, RV (O'Connor, Rory V.)[ 2 ]
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
IET Software
Volume
9
Issue
5
Start Page
129
End Page
134
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 35
Google Scholar™


